205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 119.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.76%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -13.22%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-550.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 11.04%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.73%
SBC growth well above AMD's 12.62%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
40.90%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -90.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-538.89%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AMD at -416.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
16.95%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 28.45%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
159.68%
AP growth well above AMD's 223.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
71.68%
Growth well above AMD's 20.66%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-177.42%
Negative yoy while AMD is 83.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.60%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -22.02%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-47.25%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 20.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 34.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-23.87%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 29.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1150.00%
We have some outflow growth while AMD is negative at -116.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-8617.86%
We reduce yoy invests while AMD stands at 64.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.21%
Debt repayment growth of 64.21% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-23.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
23.30%
Buyback growth below 50% of AMD's 72.61%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.