205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 1007.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.67%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -2.86%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-90.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 20.44%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.83%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 1.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
98.82%
Slight usage while AMD is negative at -43.99%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
74.68%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -173.16%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
59.41%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 136.75%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-63.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -331.78%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
359.38%
Some yoy usage while AMD is negative at -10.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
61.63%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -76.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.46%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AMD's 11.08%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-3.39%
Negative yoy CapEx while AMD is 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.89%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. AMD's 55.44%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-5.87%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AMD at -6.87%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-111.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -900.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
28.97%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. AMD's 123.29%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
4.62%
Issuance growth of 4.62% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
41.77%
We have some buyback growth while AMD is negative at -1121.21%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.