205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Net income growth under 50% of AVGO's 66.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
D&A growth well above AVGO's 7.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-19.72%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.43%
SBC growth while AVGO is negative at -7.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
108.15%
Slight usage while AVGO is negative at -333.92%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-134.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AVGO at -129.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
72.62%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AVGO's 685.71%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
232.47%
A yoy AP increase while AVGO is negative at -25.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
96.78%
Growth well above AVGO's 63.92%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
102.42%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AVGO's 3696.86%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
54.47%
Some CFO growth while AVGO is negative at -4.88%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while AVGO is negative at -8.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while AVGO stands at 97.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Some yoy expansion while AVGO is negative at -353.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
18.97%
We have some liquidation growth while AVGO is negative at -52.81%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
175.00%
Growth well above AVGO's 120.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
100.00%
Investing outflow well above AVGO's 97.23%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
89.93%
Debt repayment similar to AVGO's 93.12%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
281.54%
Issuance growth of 281.54% while AVGO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2266.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 81.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.