205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.23%
Some net income increase while AVGO is negative at -167.52%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.51%
Some D&A expansion while AVGO is negative at -0.24%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
61.18%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AVGO's 811.94%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-25.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AVGO at -5.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-262.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AVGO is 13.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-277.50%
AR is negative yoy while AVGO is 262.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-726.09%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AVGO at -80.49%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-87.25%
Negative yoy AP while AVGO is 501.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2910.00%
Some yoy usage while AVGO is negative at -225.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-1166.67%
Both negative yoy, with AVGO at -101.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
10.25%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 8.36%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-23.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -30.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while AVGO stands at 721.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.06%
Some yoy expansion while AVGO is negative at -23.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-13.74%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AVGO at -88.10%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-186.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -33.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-993.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -111.35%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-52.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with AVGO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-347.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while AVGO is 12.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.