PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -34.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.58%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-13.89%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-34.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while INTC is 43.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-56.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -105.29%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-804.76%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 158.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2998.00%
Both negative yoy, with INTC at -26.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.72%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -26.91%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.33%
CapEx growth well above INTC's 1.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
84.18%
Acquisition growth of 84.18% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-165.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 30.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-15.46%
Both yoy lines are negative, with INTC at -13.43%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
49700.00%
Growth well above INTC's 162.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
146.91%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 70.05%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
11.58%
Debt repayment well below INTC's 25.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-3.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -68.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
27.99%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 66.02%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.