205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -18.51%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.90%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 12.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
96.36%
Some yoy growth while INTC is negative at -122.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.55%
Less SBC growth vs. INTC's 13.69%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-149.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -242.74%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-73.31%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with INTC at -317.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-144.83%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with INTC at -186.47%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
54.88%
Lower AP growth vs. INTC's 175.51%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-323.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -183.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
100.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. INTC's 34325.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-53.76%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -55.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
32.68%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -4.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-1660.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while INTC stands at 27.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
79.61%
Purchases well above INTC's 29.58%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
60.84%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x INTC's 3.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.08%
Investing outflow well above INTC's 55.72%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 53.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
103.94%
Issuance growth of 103.94% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.