205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.10%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 35.84%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.69%
Negative yoy D&A while INTC is 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5800.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
7.69%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -9.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
46.99%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -1835.53%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
74.03%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -150.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
31.67%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -156.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
68.52%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -228.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-12.90%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 84.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
471.43%
Well above INTC's 64.71%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
34.65%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -22.08%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 12.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -50.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
39.84%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x INTC's 8.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-11600.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while INTC is 5180.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-210.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -188.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.27%
Negative yoy issuance while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
2.39%
Buyback growth below 50% of INTC's 7.07%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.