PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Some net income increase while INTC is negative at -35.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.81%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with INTC at -4.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-345.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 365.12%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.56%
SBC growth while INTC is negative at -18.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
101.29%
Slight usage while INTC is negative at -116.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.00%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -122.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
37.72%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 17.54%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
137.50%
A yoy AP increase while INTC is negative at -113.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
177.03%
Growth well above INTC's 70.44%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-60.32%
Negative yoy while INTC is 2771.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.71%
Some CFO growth while INTC is negative at -5.18%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -69.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 25.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
34.44%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -44.11%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-4966.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -87.54%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-88.66%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 73.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
Issuance growth of 183.82% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
16.35%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -1.39%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.