PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 43.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.00%
D&A growth well above INTC's 4.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-112.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while INTC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.36%
Both cut yoy SBC, with INTC at -8.30%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
24.31%
Less working capital growth vs. INTC's 807.62%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
266.67%
AR growth while INTC is negative at -189.10%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-25.00%
Negative yoy inventory while INTC is 107.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
211.54%
AP growth well above INTC's 26.38%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-40.30%
Negative yoy usage while INTC is 1108.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
141.82%
Some yoy increase while INTC is negative at -104.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
10.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of INTC's 41.18%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
47.54%
Some CapEx rise while INTC is negative at -31.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-47.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -67.32%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-312.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 54.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
10.00%
We have some liquidation growth while INTC is negative at -14.81%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
32.42%
We have some outflow growth while INTC is negative at -3784.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-254.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -18.92%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
Issuance growth of 32.88% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
47.16%
We have some buyback growth while INTC is negative at -48.28%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.