205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with INTC at -114.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.42%
D&A growth well above INTC's 1.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
49.29%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. INTC's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
55.88%
SBC growth well above INTC's 48.12%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-227.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -3984.21%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-38.62%
AR is negative yoy while INTC is 114.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
7.69%
Some inventory rise while INTC is negative at -207.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-670.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with INTC at -237.37%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-261.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with INTC at -187.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1650.00%
Negative yoy while INTC is 130.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-47.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with INTC at -126.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-8.71%
Negative yoy CapEx while INTC is 10.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
6500.00%
Acquisition spending well above INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-89.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while INTC stands at 14.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-22.87%
We reduce yoy sales while INTC is 22.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with INTC at -81.51%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-970.42%
We reduce yoy invests while INTC stands at 51.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while INTC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
We slightly raise equity while INTC is negative at -60.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
95.38%
Buyback growth of 95.38% while INTC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.