PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-185.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -132.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.42%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 2.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-133.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.46%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -7.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.63%
Inventory growth well above LSCC's 121.54%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.45%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -73.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
138.10%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -46.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
392.44%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -131.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
62.00%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -0.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.35%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
16.62%
Liquidation growth of 16.62% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.91%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LSCC's 224.83%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -54.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-2057.14%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 27.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.