PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.18%
Some net income increase while LSCC is negative at -29.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.26%
Less D&A growth vs. LSCC's 1.12%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-1028.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.21%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -129.70%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.24%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -90.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-317.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -137.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
440.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. LSCC's 80460.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
34.92%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -98.89%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-43.83%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 8.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.34%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 21.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.22%
We have some liquidation growth while LSCC is negative at -38.41%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -56.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.83%
Negative yoy issuance while LSCC is 2869.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
1.64%
Buyback growth of 1.64% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.