205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.64%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 13.16%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.72%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -4.90%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
163.22%
Deferred tax of 163.22% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
840.00%
Slight usage while LSCC is negative at -75.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -21.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
375.64%
Some yoy usage while LSCC is negative at -97.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
179.59%
Well above LSCC's 75.72%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
83.07%
Some CFO growth while LSCC is negative at -46.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-75.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -19.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-726.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -10.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-0.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with LSCC at -27.67%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-304.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -128.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.93%
Issuance growth of 37.93% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
61.61%
Buyback growth of 61.61% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.