205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LSCC at -567.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.39%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -3.48%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
96.10%
Well above LSCC's 64.11% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-318.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -10.61%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.15%
Negative yoy inventory while LSCC is 34.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-314.61%
Negative yoy usage while LSCC is 103.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
91.48%
Some yoy increase while LSCC is negative at -4.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-34.44%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with LSCC at -30.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.36%
Some CapEx rise while LSCC is negative at -43.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.62%
Some yoy expansion while LSCC is negative at -39.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-33.09%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 154.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-85.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -101.52%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-251.72%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 90.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
201.96%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. LSCC's 755.88%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
24.16%
Buyback growth of 24.16% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.