PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.87%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 50.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.79%
Some D&A expansion while LSCC is negative at -1.37%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
36.36%
Deferred tax of 36.36% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.26%
SBC growth well above LSCC's 6.86%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-129.33%
Negative yoy working capital usage while LSCC is 43.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
25.10%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. LSCC's 106.85%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
1.35%
Some inventory rise while LSCC is negative at -272.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-233.33%
Both negative yoy AP, with LSCC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-97.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LSCC at -41.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.85%
Negative yoy CFO while LSCC is 34.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -42.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -25.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
43.04%
Below 50% of LSCC's 98.80%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
We have mild expansions while LSCC is negative at -4.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.81%
We cut yoy buybacks while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.