PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of LSCC's 4.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.17%
D&A growth well above LSCC's 1.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
78.57%
Deferred tax of 78.57% while LSCC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-20.00%
Negative yoy SBC while LSCC is 6.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.17%
Well above LSCC's 57.43% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
137.97%
AR growth well above LSCC's 31.56%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-47.48%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with LSCC at -188.97%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
121.05%
Lower AP growth vs. LSCC's 408.76%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
227.40%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. LSCC's 879.37%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
83.24%
Well above LSCC's 104.69%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
56.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x LSCC's 28.55%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-32.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while LSCC is 7.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-76.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while LSCC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.79%
We reduce yoy sales while LSCC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-112.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -10.89%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-272.49%
We reduce yoy invests while LSCC stands at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-39.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LSCC at -3328.57%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
39.29%
We slightly raise equity while LSCC is negative at -75.30%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
15.74%
We have some buyback growth while LSCC is negative at -13.69%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.