205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
281.40%
Some net income increase while MCHP is negative at -31.57%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MCHP's 1188.36%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
82.20%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -10.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.46%
Negative yoy CapEx while MCHP is 7.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while MCHP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-35.94%
We reduce yoy sales while MCHP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1618.75%
We reduce yoy other investing while MCHP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-428.37%
We reduce yoy invests while MCHP stands at 7.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -49.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
20.45%
Buyback growth of 20.45% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.