205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.28%
Some net income increase while MCHP is negative at -10.21%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-106.81%
Both negative yoy, with MCHP at -84.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-48.82%
Negative yoy CFO while MCHP is 114.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-89.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while MCHP is 45.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
67.16%
Purchases growth of 67.16% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
83.92%
Liquidation growth of 83.92% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
133.55%
Investing outflow well above MCHP's 45.48%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.65%
Negative yoy issuance while MCHP is 20.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-103.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -141.59%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.