PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
258.74%
Some net income increase while MCHP is negative at -48.14%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.36%
D&A growth well above MCHP's 1.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
320.25%
Well above MCHP's 345.99% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.58%
Slight usage while MCHP is negative at -259.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.00%
Some inventory rise while MCHP is negative at -232.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.86%
Some yoy usage while MCHP is negative at -109.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-214.71%
Negative yoy while MCHP is 124.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
109.22%
Some CFO growth while MCHP is negative at -24.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-17.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while MCHP is 16.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.10%
Purchases growth of 11.10% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
13.91%
Liquidation growth of 13.91% while MCHP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
82.81%
We have some outflow growth while MCHP is negative at -133.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.32%
We have mild expansions while MCHP is negative at -273.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.94%
Stock issuance far above MCHP's 8.37%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-91.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with MCHP at -82713.04%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.