205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.10%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -0.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.62%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 14.60%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-57.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 2.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.59%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -39.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.63%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -1.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
272.97%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -71.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-841.00%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -1377.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-43.00%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MPWR at -7.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
8.77%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -19.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.91%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MPWR's 90.11%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-27.75%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MPWR at -50.26%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.65%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 93.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.67%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -169.11%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.