205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
350.00%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -0.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.41%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 14.60%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-152.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 2.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -39.62%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-205.88%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -1.87%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.73%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -71.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
115.79%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -1377.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
30.74%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -7.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-47.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -19.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.20%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MPWR's 90.11%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
35.70%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -50.26%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.90%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 93.86%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.33%
Issuance growth of 183.33% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-138.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -169.11%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.