205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.18%
Net income growth of 18.18% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
0.26%
D&A growth of 0.26% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-1028.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.21%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.24%
Inventory growth of 104.24% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-317.65%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
440.00%
Growth of 440.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
34.92%
CFO growth of 34.92% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-43.83%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.34%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.22%
Liquidation growth of 12.22% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.52%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.83%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
1.64%
Buyback growth of 1.64% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.