205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.66%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -58.21%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.14%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 50.00%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-51.76%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.95%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -289.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.18%
Inventory growth of 48.18% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.54%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -289.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-460.00%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 85.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
86.17%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MPWR's 35.48%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
7.30%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -160.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.49%
Purchases growth of 19.49% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-19.42%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.65%
We have mild expansions while MPWR is negative at -900.01%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
13.27%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.00%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.