205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1429.41%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 537.64%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.92%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 4.88%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while MPWR is negative at -34022.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-6.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 12.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
80.61%
Well above MPWR's 145.36% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
46.79%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MPWR's 121.64%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-86.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -565.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -94.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
250.00%
Growth well above MPWR's 167.95%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 1278.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
121.91%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MPWR's 2522.62%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-11.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -159.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
50.96%
Acquisition growth of 50.96% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-55.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -32.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-19.81%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 10.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -53.76%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
5.56%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 107.05%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-147.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.