PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.70%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 106.32%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.75%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 7.39%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-285.71%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-4.08%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MPWR at -24.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
148.85%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -705.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
84.57%
AR growth well above MPWR's 65.97%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
9.59%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -4541.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. MPWR's 388.55%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
8100.00%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -180.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.52%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MPWR's 6.76%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-39.93%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 36.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MPWR's 18.16%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-64.00%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-424.51%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 75.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -70.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
20.00%
Buyback growth of 20.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.