205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MPWR at -47.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -5.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
121.68%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MPWR's 2728.57%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
21.28%
SBC growth while MPWR is negative at -3.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-268.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -120.50%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-118.57%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -94.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-73.63%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 141.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-239.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -640.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -145.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-58.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MPWR at -19.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.55%
CapEx growth well above MPWR's 27.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-24.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 52.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
153.36%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MPWR's 2.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.50%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 295.24%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.95%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 314.80%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-28.50%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 5.64%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.