PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 57.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.04%
Some yoy growth while MPWR is negative at -83.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
75.47%
SBC growth while MPWR is negative at -8.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
173.20%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -171.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
121.57%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MPWR's 2105.66%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
126.19%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 172.51%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.95%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -181.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-105.88%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 339.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
80.35%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -32.96%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
30.07%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -510.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -247.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
199.82%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -45.31%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-762.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -141.66%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
65.68%
Debt repayment growth of 65.68% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-81.67%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 24.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.44%
Buyback growth below 50% of MPWR's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.