205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -29.06%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.97%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -2.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-54.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.28%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 10.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
34.11%
Less working capital growth vs. MPWR's 196.52%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-10.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -61.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-276.47%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MPWR at -1598.77%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
49.57%
AP growth well above MPWR's 80.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
99.28%
Growth well above MPWR's 161.13%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
81.82%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -11.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.75%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 113.63%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-3.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 68.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -11.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
64.84%
At 50-75% of MPWR's 88.06%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-302.63%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 129.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
362.95%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 114.71%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-55.83%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -9.51%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.