PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MPWR at -21.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
185.19%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MPWR's 1600.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-3.23%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MPWR at -3.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
49.40%
Well above MPWR's 96.62% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
430.95%
AR growth well above MPWR's 52.09%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-371.43%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 291.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.50%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -349.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-82.87%
Negative yoy usage while MPWR is 150.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.39%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -279.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.03%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 28.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-21.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -0.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
21.36%
Acquisition growth of 21.36% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-33.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -88.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
15.29%
Below 50% of MPWR's 172.54%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
68.13%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MPWR's 153.97%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-28.20%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 272.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
Issuance growth of 105.88% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while MPWR is 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.