205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 41.80%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MPWR at -2.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
12.28%
Deferred tax of 12.28% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-21.43%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 10.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
231.82%
Well above MPWR's 80.82% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -161.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
378.05%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 79.68%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while MPWR is 48.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Growth well above MPWR's 19.23%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while MPWR is 59.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.83%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MPWR's 187.56%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-11.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 10.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
11.20%
Acquisition growth of 11.20% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.05%
Purchases well above MPWR's 38.63%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
13.95%
We have some liquidation growth while MPWR is negative at -32.15%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-14.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -13.52%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
323.56%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 57.67%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-31.37%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -76.15%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.