PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 5.89%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.81%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.83%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.56%
Less SBC growth vs. MPWR's 30.83%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
101.29%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -282.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.00%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -226.03%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
37.72%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -994.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
137.50%
AP growth well above MPWR's 14.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
177.03%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -3459.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-60.32%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -549.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.71%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -48.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -149.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 41.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
34.44%
Similar to MPWR's 35.37%. Walter Schloss finds parallel timing in investment disposals or maturities.
-4966.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 42.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-88.66%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 92.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
Issuance growth of 183.82% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
16.35%
Buyback growth of 16.35% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.