205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 28.35%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
-2.07%
Negative yoy D&A while MPWR is 3.26%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-111.86%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-26.32%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 15.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4400.00%
Well above MPWR's 120.98% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-28.95%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 21.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
195.77%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 89.96%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-76.92%
Both negative yoy AP, with MPWR at -138.16%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
155.26%
Growth well above MPWR's 237.79%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-72.00%
Both negative yoy, with MPWR at -100.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
32.18%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MPWR's 119.49%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
12.03%
CapEx growth well above MPWR's 22.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-12.03%
Negative yoy acquisition while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1.51%
Some yoy expansion while MPWR is negative at -4.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-57.44%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 4.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
7.89%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -16.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-1027.69%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 127.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-20.21%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.12%
Buyback growth of 5.12% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.