PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 84.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.40%
Less D&A growth vs. MPWR's 10.11%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MPWR stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.54%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-630.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MPWR at -181.68%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-254.29%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MPWR at -4742.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
148.12%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 119.66%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-117.81%
Both negative yoy AP, with MPWR at -47.95%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
40.91%
Growth well above MPWR's 25.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
100.00%
Well above MPWR's 75.42%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-16.10%
Negative yoy CFO while MPWR is 30.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-12.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -34.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
12.31%
Acquisition growth of 12.31% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-920.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 7.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-71.82%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MPWR at -10.58%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-28.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -1.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-252.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -17.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
41.38%
Issuance growth of 41.38% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
98.30%
Buyback growth of 98.30% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.