205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.17%
D&A growth well above MPWR's 1.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
78.57%
Well above MPWR's 116.57% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-20.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.17%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -194.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.97%
AR growth while MPWR is negative at -436.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-47.48%
Negative yoy inventory while MPWR is 22.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
121.05%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -98.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
227.40%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -4532.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
83.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MPWR's 25040.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
56.45%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -117.28%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-32.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while MPWR is 38.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-76.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 100.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.79%
We reduce yoy sales while MPWR is 15.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-112.20%
We reduce yoy other investing while MPWR is 52.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-272.49%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 69.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-39.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
39.29%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. MPWR's 305.23%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
15.74%
Buyback growth of 15.74% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.