205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
D&A growth well above MPWR's 5.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-19.72%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.43%
SBC growth well above MPWR's 13.89%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
108.15%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -106.66%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-134.48%
AR is negative yoy while MPWR is 350.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
72.62%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -165.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
232.47%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -114.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
96.78%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -107.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
102.42%
Well above MPWR's 39.62%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
54.47%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -43.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while MPWR is negative at -97.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while MPWR stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Purchases well above MPWR's 38.84%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
18.97%
Below 50% of MPWR's 80.78%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
175.00%
We have some outflow growth while MPWR is negative at -2797.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.00%
Investing outflow well above MPWR's 98.74%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
89.93%
Debt repayment growth of 89.93% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
281.54%
Issuance growth of 281.54% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2266.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -11.63%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.