PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Some net income increase while MPWR is negative at -0.05%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.44%
D&A growth well above MPWR's 14.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
42.53%
Well above MPWR's 2.11% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MPWR is 13.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
100.69%
Slight usage while MPWR is negative at -39.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
47.52%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MPWR's 147.41%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
21.88%
Some inventory rise while MPWR is negative at -1.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
176.03%
A yoy AP increase while MPWR is negative at -28.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
137.09%
Some yoy usage while MPWR is negative at -71.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
318.64%
Some yoy increase while MPWR is negative at -1377.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
119.08%
Some CFO growth while MPWR is negative at -7.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -19.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while MPWR stands at 90.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with MPWR at -324.35%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-206.54%
We reduce yoy invests while MPWR stands at 93.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while MPWR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-2.54%
Negative yoy issuance while MPWR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.75%
We have some buyback growth while MPWR is negative at -169.11%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.