PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.66%
Net income growth similar to MRVL's 26.89%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
3.14%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -3.32%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-51.76%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.95%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -301.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.18%
Some inventory rise while MRVL is negative at -21.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.54%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -39.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-460.00%
Negative yoy while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
86.17%
Some CFO growth while MRVL is negative at -15.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
7.30%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -110.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.49%
Some yoy expansion while MRVL is negative at -0.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-19.42%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MRVL at -30.74%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.65%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -137.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MRVL is 48.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
13.27%
Buyback growth of 13.27% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.