205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.97%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 65.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.05%
Some D&A expansion while MRVL is negative at -0.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-200.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1342.86%
Slight usage while MRVL is negative at -8.39%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.85%
Inventory growth well above MRVL's 10.59%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
476.74%
Some yoy usage while MRVL is negative at -38.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
464.29%
Growth of 464.29% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
38.54%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MRVL's 25.54%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
36.06%
Some CapEx rise while MRVL is negative at -356.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.93%
Purchases well above MRVL's 50.54%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
1.24%
We have some liquidation growth while MRVL is negative at -5.68%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.01%
We have mild expansions while MRVL is negative at -109.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-277.55%
We cut yoy buybacks while MRVL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.