PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.32%
Negative net income growth while MRVL stands at 62.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
32.80%
D&A growth well above MRVL's 2.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1950.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MRVL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.67%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MRVL is 93.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-600.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MRVL at -5.59%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.01%
Negative yoy usage while MRVL is 152.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-99.31%
Both negative yoy, with MRVL at -61.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-54.95%
Negative yoy CFO while MRVL is 692.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while MRVL is 14.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above MRVL's 99.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
54.39%
Purchases growth of 54.39% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-52.92%
We reduce yoy sales while MRVL is 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.19%
We reduce yoy invests while MRVL stands at 77.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.43%
We slightly raise equity while MRVL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
53.46%
Buyback growth of 53.46% while MRVL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.