PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -15.35%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.44%
D&A growth well above MU's 2.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
42.53%
Deferred tax of 42.53% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 13.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
100.69%
Well above MU's 200.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
47.52%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MU's 241.37%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
21.88%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -277.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
176.03%
A yoy AP increase while MU is negative at -96.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
137.09%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 515.53%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
318.64%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -688.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
119.08%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 21.52%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-16.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -16.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 1.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-206.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -0.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
259.87%
Debt repayment growth of 259.87% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-2.54%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.75%
Buyback growth of 53.75% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.