PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -145.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.03%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 10.53%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
70.93%
Well above MU's 50.62% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-153.57%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -19.21%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
60.21%
Growth well above MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
686.67%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -460.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
62.09%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -33.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.79%
CapEx growth well above MU's 1.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -68.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-74.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 78.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.73%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -23.17%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -109.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-188.64%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 44.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
We slightly raise equity while MU is negative at -78.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.42%
Buyback growth of 13.42% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.