205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
27.21%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -332.69%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.68%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 5.71%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
1300.00%
Well above MU's 180.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
579.12%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -560.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.67%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 13.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
718.42%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -177.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-114.77%
Negative yoy while MU is 155.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
70.49%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -73.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.64%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MU's 37.93%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -27.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-10.17%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -33.22%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
3150.00%
Growth well above MU's 201.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-410.24%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 25.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-55.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -44.44%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-89.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.