PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1429.41%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -6.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.92%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -9.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-6.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
80.61%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -185.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
46.79%
AR growth of 46.79% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-86.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -638.46%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
250.00%
Growth well above MU's 470.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while MU is 143.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
121.91%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -5.57%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-11.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 61.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
50.96%
Acquisition growth of 50.96% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-55.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -20500.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-19.81%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -94.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.88%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 73.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
5.56%
Issuance growth of 5.56% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-147.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.