PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 94.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-54.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.28%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 22.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
34.11%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -66.93%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-10.74%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 107.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-276.47%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -101.05%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
49.57%
AP growth of 49.57% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
99.28%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -31.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
81.82%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -65.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.75%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -7.76%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Purchases well above MU's 16.84%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
64.84%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -2.47%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-302.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -93.97%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
362.95%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -2347.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -69.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-55.83%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 26.19%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.