PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 8.77%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.33%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 3.03%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
52.63%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -1.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-19.48%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
165.88%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -4.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.45%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MU's 255.56%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
76.67%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -3450.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
18.64%
AP growth of 18.64% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
18200.00%
Growth well above MU's 50.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
130.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -12.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
78.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 4.68%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-28.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 3.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
28.75%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -40.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-69.64%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 13.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-68.16%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -12.66%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-18.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -54.55%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-147.76%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 8.24%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-45.60%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
9.83%
Buyback growth below 50% of MU's 93.55%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.