205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 84.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Well above MU's 70.64% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-28.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
140.76%
Well above MU's 17.41% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
19.70%
AR growth while MU is negative at -51.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
137.50%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -288.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
291.67%
AP growth of 291.67% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
205.85%
Growth well above MU's 32.29%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-110.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 35.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
87.79%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 71.32%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -8.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -157.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 80.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 143.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 118.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6000.00%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 80.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -230.98%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-9.52%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.