PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
297.09%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 13.04%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
2.23%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-119.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 151.52%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
55.56%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -10.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-141.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -132.78%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-158.86%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 61.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-97.96%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 36.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-172.86%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-118.17%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -213.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-282.14%
Negative yoy while MU is 119.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-42.35%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 13.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
18.18%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -37.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -463.21%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
31.31%
Purchases well above MU's 33.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
84.18%
Below 50% of MU's 341.72%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
98.32%
Growth well above MU's 63.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
129.62%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -10.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -250.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
9.88%
Issuance growth of 9.88% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-23.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.