PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -13.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth well above MU's 7.46%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-247.40%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -50.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-190.30%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -458.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-105.13%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 182.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
303.45%
AP growth of 303.45% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-505.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -102.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-190.91%
Negative yoy while MU is 107.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-51.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -9.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.23%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MU's 5.17%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -0.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
437.05%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 0.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
96.79%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -98.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
143.00%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -8.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
0.13%
We repay more while MU is negative at -46.78%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
204.17%
Issuance growth of 204.17% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-235.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -4350.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.