PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 16.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.17%
D&A growth well above MU's 4.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
78.57%
Well above MU's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-20.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 1.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.17%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -36.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.97%
AR growth while MU is negative at -676.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-47.48%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 55.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
121.05%
AP growth well above MU's 84.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
227.40%
Growth well above MU's 412.50%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
83.24%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 6943.94%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
56.45%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 5.79%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-32.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-76.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -10.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-27.79%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 14.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-112.20%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 130.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-272.49%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-39.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 15.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
39.29%
Issuance growth of 39.29% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
15.74%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -140.44%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.