PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 164.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
D&A growth well above MU's 0.47%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-19.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.43%
SBC growth well above MU's 13.30%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
108.15%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -471.96%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-134.48%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -151.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
72.62%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -251.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
232.47%
AP growth well above MU's 11.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
96.78%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -201.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
102.42%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 7101.39%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
54.47%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -12.99%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
CapEx growth well above MU's 22.94%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-98.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
56.87%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -33.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
18.97%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -5.88%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
175.00%
Growth well above MU's 108.48%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
100.00%
Investing outflow well above MU's 26.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
89.93%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 7.55%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
281.54%
Issuance growth of 281.54% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2266.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.